Annotated Bibliography and Final Paper Topic Choice This paper preparation assignment will require the following: •State your topic choice for the Final Paper and explain why you chose it. (1 paragraph) •Provide a brief summary of what you plan to research about your topic. For example, in-depth paper might require regarding the pros and cons of INFJ MBTI personality type in groups compared to ISTJ personality types in groups, while an in-breadth topic might examine 16 MBTI personality types interacting in groups. (1 paragraph) •Explain what you hope to learn through the experience. (1 paragraph) •Compile an annotated bibliography, which will consist of no fewer than eight scholarly resources that are less than 6 years old, with the exception that you may include no more than two older articles that are widely recognized as seminal or classic works. Click here to view a list of topics and topic categoriesPreview the document, one of which may provide a useful starting point for your Final Paper topic selection. Review the following guidelines regarding how to create an annotated bibliography in APA style, 6th edition: UoR Annotated Bibliography Tutorial (Links to an external site.) Purdue Owl Annotated Bibliography Samples
Resources Required Text Adams, K., & Galanes, G. (2017). Communicating in groups: Application and skills (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Chapter 7: Creative and Critical Thinking in the Small Group Chapter 8: Group Problem-Solving Procedures Chapter 9: Managing Small Group Conflict Productively Recommended References Greer, L. (2014). Managing conflict in teams [Video file]. Retrieved from Lindred Greer: Managing Conflict in Teams (Links to an external site.) HeroicImaginationTV. (2011). Group identity – Ingroup and outgroup formation [Video file]. Retrieved from Group Identity – Ingroup and Outgroup Formation (Links to an external site.) Schnall, E., & Greenberg, M. J. (2012). Groupthink and the sanhedrin. Journal of Management History, 18(3), 285-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17511341211236228 Siegel, D. J. (2010, November). Vying for the prize. Association for Psychological Science [Web page]. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2010/november-10/vying-for-the-prize-competition-in-large-and-small-groups.html
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more